Virtualization Blog

Discussions and observations on virtualization.

Creedence Release Candidate Available

Just in time for the holiday season - we're pleased to announce a another tech toy for the geeks of the world to play with. Now of course XenServer is serious business, but just like many kids toys, the arrival of Creedence is eagerly awaited by many. As I mentioned earlier this week, you'll have to wait a bit longer for the official release, but today you can download the release candidate and see exactly what the world of Creedence should look like. Andy also mentioned last week that we're closing out the alpha/beta program, and as part of that effort the nightly Creedence snapshot page has been removed. You can still access the final beta (beta.3) on the pre-release page, but all prior builds have been removed. The pre-release page is also where you can download the release candidate.

What's in the Release Candidate

Performance tuning

The release candidate contains a number of bug fixes, but also has had some performance tuning done on it. This performance tuning is a little bit different than what we normally talk about, so if you've been benchmarking Creedence, you'll want to double check with the release candidate. What we've done is take a look at the interaction of a variety of system components and put in some limits on how hard we'll let you push them. Our first objective is a rock solid system, and while this work doesn't result in any configuration limit changes (at least not yet - that comes later in our cycle), it could reduce some of the headroom you might have experienced with a prior build. It's also possible that you could experience better headroom due to an overall improvement in system stability, so doing a performance test or two isn't a bad idea.

Core bug fixes over beta.3

  • mulitpath.conf is now preserved as multipath.conf.bak on upgrade
  • The default cpufreq governor is now set to performance
  • Fixes for XSA-109 through XSA-114 inclusive
  • Increase the number of PIRQs to more than 256 to support large quantities of NICs per host

What we'd like you to do with this build

The core two things we'd like you to do with this build are:

  1. If you've reported any issue at, please validate that we did indeed get the issue addressed.
  2. If you can, run this release candidate through its paces. We think it's nice and solid, and hope you do too.

Lastly, I'd like to take this opportunity to wish everyone in our community a festive end to 2014 and hope that what ever celebrating you might do is enjoyable. 2014 was an exciting year for XenServer, and that's in large part to the contributions of everyone reading this blog and working with Creedence. Thank you.



Recent Comments
Tassos Papadopoulos
Boot from iSCSI is not supported on XS6.2. We had to do some hacks to do make it possible on Cisco UCS Blades. Are you going to su... Read More
Monday, 22 December 2014 07:21
Is "xe vm-export" performance improved in Creedence? From my test on RC, it looks similar, around 15MB/sec, even on 10GBE link: ... Read More
Monday, 22 December 2014 17:03
Tim Mackey
@Nathan, Since this is pre-release software intended for testing, no official upgrade path exists to the final release. Practica... Read More
Monday, 05 January 2015 19:53
Continue reading
15991 Hits

Status of Creedence

Over the past few weeks, and particularly as part of the Creedence World Tour, I've been getting questions about precisely when Creedence will be released. To the best of my ability, I've tried to take those questions head on, but the reality is we haven't been transparent about what happens when we release XenServer, and that's part of the problem. I'm going to try and address some of that in this post.

Now before I get into too much detail, it's important to note that XenServer is a packaged product which Citrix sells, and which is also available freely as open source. Citrix is a public company, so there is often a ton more detail I have, but which isn't appropriate for public disclosure. A perfect case in point is the release date. Since conceivably someone could change a PO based on this information, disclosing that can impact revenue and, well, I like my pay-cheque so I hope you understand when I'm quiet on some things.

So back to the question of what happens during finalization of a release, and how that can create a void. The first thing we do is take a look at all the defects coming in from all sources; with being one of many. We look at the nature of any open issues and determine what the potential for us to have a bad release from them. Next we create internal training to be delivered to the product support teams. These two tasks typically occur with either a final beta, or first release candidate. Concurrent to much of this work is finalization of documentation, and defining the performance envelope of the release. With each release, we have a "configuration limits" document, and the contents of that document represent both what Citrix is willing to deliver support on and what constitutes the limits of a stable XenServer configuration. For practical purposes, many of you have pushed Creedence in some way beyond what we might be comfortable defining as a "long term stable configuration", so its entirely possible the final performance could differ from what you've experienced so far.

Those are the technical bits behind the release, but this is also something which needs to be sold and that means we need to prepare for that as well. In the context of XenServer, selling means both why XenServer is great with XenDesktop, but also why it's great for anyone who is tired of paying more for their core virtualization requirements than really necessary. Given how many areas of data center operations XenServer touches, and the magnitude of the changes in Creedence, getting this right is critical. Then of course there is all the marketing collateral, and you get a sense of how much work is involved in getting XenServer out the door.

Of course, it can be argued that much of this "readiness" stuff could be handled in parallel, and for another project you'd be right. The reality is XenServer has had its share of releases which should've had a bit more bake time. I hope you agree with me that Creedence is better because we haven't rushed it, and that with Creedence we have a solid platform upon which to build. So with that in mind, I'll leave you with it hopefully being obvious that we intend to make a big splash with Creedence. Such a splash can't occur if we release during a typical IT lockdown period, and will need a bit larger stage than the one I'm currently on.


So stay tuned, my friends.  Good things are coming ;)

Recent Comments
Tim Mackey
Thanks @M.N..
Tuesday, 16 December 2014 14:42
tl;dr -- So what you're basically saying is that there is no release date yet.
Tuesday, 16 December 2014 12:03
Tim Mackey
@Christian It would be more precise to say that I know when it is intended to be released, but due to a variety of disclosure and... Read More
Tuesday, 16 December 2014 14:40
Continue reading
10519 Hits

Creedence Final Beta Available

As we move steadily towards a release of XenServer Creedence, I'm pleased to announce that we're ending the beta phase of development with the release of Creedence beta.3. Beta.3 sees us as functionally complete, and with the majority of known performance issues resolved. The performance issues resolved range from a dom0 memory leak when VIFs are disabled, through to resolution of a workaround with Mellanox 40Gbps NICs, and some are resolved with both an updated driver bundle and a bump of the ovs version from 2.1.2 to 2.1.3. Functionally, beta.3 differs from beta.2 in having PVHVM support for Ubuntu 14.04, RedHat Enterprise Linux 7 and CentOS 7. Since these are new operating systems for us, the team is really interested in learning what you see for performance and stability for them.

As with all previous pre-release builds, we'd like the community to help ensure Creedence is a rock solid release. This time we're a bit less interested in Creedence itself, and more about the operating and support environment. One of the less known "features" of Citrix support is the free "Insight Services" or "TaaS". TaaS was originally designed to be "Tools-as-a-Service", and deliver on demand insight into the operation of Citrix technologies. With XenServer, Citrix Insight Services consumes a server status report from your XenServer host or pool, and then provides detailed guidance on how to potentially avoid an issue (say due to outdated BIOS or firmware), or resolve an issue you might be having (say by applying a hotfix). Honestly, it's not a bad practice in general to upload a server status report post XenServer install to ensure there aren't any items which could be latent in the deployment; rather like a health check.

How does this relate to Creedence? Well, Insight Services uses a series of plugins to ensure the data is processed properly. The support team has recently updated TaaS to support Creedence, and I'd like to ensure two things. First I'd like to ensure the processing logic is capturing everything it should, and secondly I'd like to ensure that those of you who have been successfully running Creedence don't have any hidden errors. Since this is a free service offered by Citrix, I'd also like the open source XenServer install base to know about it as a way to ensure XenServer hosts are deployed in a manner which will allow for Citrix to support you if the need arises.

Here's how you can help.

  1. Install either beta.2 or beta.3 (beta.3 preferred) from the pre-release downloads:
  2. From either XenCenter or the CLI take a server status report.
    • XenCenter: Server status reports can be run from "Tools->Server Status Report ..."
    • CLI: xen-bugtool --yestoall --output zip
  3. Log into TaaS (create a free account if required):
  4. Upload your server status report and see if anything interesting is found. If anything unexpected is found, we'd like to know about it.  The best way to let us know would be to submit an incident to which contains the TaaS information.

Thanks again to everyone who has contributed to the success we're seeing with Creedence.

Recent Comments
JK Benedict
Great post, Tim! I will definitely be leveraging this tomorrow after I check in my previous posts for PVHVM OSes I have used from... Read More
Thursday, 25 September 2014 00:42
hmm.. ? should yum install work ? Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Determining fastest mirrors Could not retrieve mirrorlist http://... Read More
Friday, 26 September 2014 15:14
Tim Mackey
@Sebastian, XenServer is a packaged and tuned system, so we intentionally disable yum install. The biggest reason we do that is ... Read More
Friday, 26 September 2014 15:47
Continue reading
18612 Hits

XenServer Creedence Reaches Beta Stage

In May we announced to the world that the next version of XenServer would be code named Creedence, and officially opened a public alpha program around this new version of XenServer. That alpha program was more successful than I'd expected with well over a thousand participants. Drawing these participants to Creedence was a combination of enthusiasm for XenServer as a virtualization platform, and a desire to see us make significant improvements in that platform. What greeted them was a full platform refresh including a 64 bit dom0, modern Linux kernel and the most recent Xen Project hypervisor. Over the following weeks we invited this enthusiast community to test three additional builds, each with increasing capabilities and performance.

As the audience for the XenServer Creedence message increased, we heard from some that they wanted to wait until we exited alpha mode and entered a beta phase. I'm happy to report that we've done just that with the release on August 5th, 2014 of beta.1 for XenServer Creedence. This means we're largely feature complete, and are looking seriously at the overall performance and stability of the platform. It also means we want you to start stressing the platform with your real-world workloads. Everything is fair game at this point, and we want to know where the breaking points are. Over the coming weeks you'll see blog posts covering some of the key performance and scalability improvements that we've achieved internally, but that's internally. Your experiences will vary, and we want to know about them.

We want you to push XenServer and tell us where your expectations weren't met. Here's how to do just that:

  1. Download beta.1 and install it on your favorite hardware. If it doesn't install, we want to know. If it didn't detect the devices you have, we want to know. Oddly enough we also want to know if it does!!
  2. Create any number of VMs using your preferred operating systems, or alternatively use your favorite provisioning solution and provision some VMs. If something goes wrong here, let us know.
  3. Install into those VMs the applications you care about. Again if something goes wrong here, let us know.
  4. Exercise your applications, verify if the performance you see is what you'd expect. If it isn't let us know.
  5. While your applications are running, test core virtualization functions like live migration, storage migration, high availability, etc. Everything is fair game. If something doesn't behave as you expect, let us know.

How do you let us know of issues, you ask? Simply create a new account at and report an incident (or incidents). It's that simple. If you're looking to discuss at a deeper technical level why something might be behaving a certain way, or are seeking debugging help, then our developer list might be helpful. You can subscribe to it at:, but please understand that the developers are working hard to build XenServer and aren't product support folks.


We want Creedence to be the best XenServer release ever, and with your input it can be.     

Recent Comments
Tim Mackey
James, Thanks for the words of encouragement. beta.1 *should* be able to successfully upgrade 6.2 SP1 pools, and if it doesn't w... Read More
Wednesday, 06 August 2014 17:30
Bob Martens
Are we able to import raw Xen images?
Thursday, 07 August 2014 00:19
Tobias Kreidl
No Ceph support in Creedence, unfortunately. Keep lobbying for it! See: Read More
Wednesday, 13 August 2014 02:54
Continue reading
15482 Hits

Beyond Creedence - XenServer 2015 Planning

In a few weeks James Bulpin and I will be at the Xen Project Developers Summit in Chicago, and some of our discussions will be about the future of XenServer, and more importantly to the community "What comes after Creedence?". With the Creedence alpha program we're seeing a level of community engagement which has honestly exceeded my expectations. I attribute this to the significant improvements in the platform, but also the level of transparency we've had with respect to early access to pre-release builds.

While it was pretty obvious what we needed to do to make Creedence viable, your input is important to the future success of XenServer. With that in mind, we'd like to hear what platform improvements you'd find most valuable. When I speak of platform improvements, I'm thinking of things like storage, networking, core virtualization, performance, scalability and operating system support. I'm not thinking of things which can be classified as data center or virtualization management, so things like network management, disaster recovery, or virtual machine provisioning are out of scope. Based on the blog comments for the various alpha announcements, we already know that CentOS 7 dom0, NFS4 and Ceph are on your wish lists, but what else?

Internally we use a "How would you spend $100?" model to prioritize changes, and if you were interested in providing feedback following that model, it would be ideal. If you've never used this model before, it's pretty simple. Write down the things you'd want to see (optionally with a "why" beside them), and then given a budget of $100. Spend the $100 by allocating it to your desired functionality, and anything with a zero is removed. This has the benefit of focusing on the high value changes without worrying about complexity. If you'd like to provide input, please do so in the comments section below, and let's see what the future of XenServer in 2015 looks like from your perspective.     

Recent Comments
David Reade
Could Changed Block Tracking (CBT) be considered as a feature please to speed up incremental backups? We use Unitrends to perform ... Read More
Wednesday, 30 July 2014 17:35
Keith Walker
CBT, the entire $100.
Tuesday, 31 March 2015 18:32
$80 for CBT, $20 for online disk expansion.
Wednesday, 20 May 2015 13:12
Continue reading
58540 Hits

XenServer Creedence Tech Preview and Creedence Alpha

This morning astute followers of XenServer activity noticed that Citrix had made available the previously announced Tech Preview for Creedence. The natural follow on question is how this relates to the alpha program we've been running on The easy answer is that the Citrix Tech Preview of XenServer Creedence is binary compatible with the alpha.4 pre-release binary you can get from From the perspective of the core platform (i.e. XenServer virtualization bits), the only difference is in the EULA.

So why run a Tech Preview if you have a successful alpha program already?

That's where the differences between a pure open source effort and a commercial effort begin. While the XenServer platform components are binary compatible, Citrix customers have expectations for features which couldn't be made open source, or implementations directly supporting Citrix commercial products. Perfect examples of these features and implementations can be seen on the Tech Preview download page, such as Microsoft System Center Integration, expanded vGPU support for XenDesktop, and the return of both the DVSC and WLB. While there is no guarantee any of those features or specific implementations will be present in the final Citrix release, or for that matter under what license, Citrix is seeking your input on them and a Tech Preview program is how that is accomplished.

I can't access the Tech Preview site; what's wrong?

If you can't login to the Tech Preview site, that likely means your account isn't associated with a Citrix commercial contract for XenServer. Since the alpha.4 pre-release is binary compatible, you can experience all the platform improvements yourself by downloading XenServer from the pre-release download page.

How do I provide feedback?

If you are able to participate in the Tech Preview program, you'll find the options for feedback listed on the Tech Preview page. Of course, even if you can participate in the Tech Preview program we're always accepting XenServer feedback through our public feedback options:

The XenServer incident database:

Development feedback (xs-devel):

What cool things are in alpha.4?

This is the best for last! We've already got in Creedence a 64 bit dom0, updated Linux 3.10 kernel, updated open virtual switch 2.1.2, improved boot storm handling, read caching for file based SRs; so what goodies are in here for the core platform people? Let's start with TRIM and UNMAP to better reclaim storage, then add in 32 bit to 64 bit VM migration to support upgrade scenarios and storage migration from XenServer 6.2 and prior, all with additional operating system validation with SLES 11 SP3 and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.

What testing would you like us to do?

Don't let the alpha label fool you, alpha.4 of XenServer Creedence has been through quite a bit of testing, and is very much ready for you to try and stress it. The one thing we can say is that we're still working on the performance tuning so if you push things really hard, dom0 may run out of memory and you might need to follow CTX134951 to increase it (valid values are 8192, 16384 and 32768). This is particularly true if you're running more than 200 VMs per host, or need to attach more than 1200 virtual disks to VMs.     

Recent Comments
Tim Mackey
James, We now have the code in place to do a 32 bit to 64 bit migration, so upgrades are now on the table for testing, but I woul... Read More
Thursday, 10 July 2014 20:44
valentin radu
Hello, You can tell me when it will be released new stable version? Thx,
Tuesday, 15 July 2014 16:29
Hong Lae Cho
Hey Tim, Would you be able to provide a bit more clarification regarding "UNMAP" functionality in Creedence Alpha 4 & Tech Previ... Read More
Monday, 21 July 2014 05:10
Continue reading
26805 Hits
9 Comments Alpha Available for Download Alpha Available

The XenServer engineering team is pleased to announce the availability an alpha of the next release of XenServer, code named “Creedence”. XenServer Creedence is intended to represent the latest capabilities in XenServer with a target release date determined by feature completeness. Several key areas have been improved over XenServer 6.2, and singificantly we have also introduced a 64 bit control domain architecture and updated the Xen Project hypervisor to version 4.4. Due to these changes, we are requesting tests using this alpha be limited to core functionality such as the installation process and basic operations like VM creation, start and stop. Performance and scalability tests should be deferred until a later build is nominated to alpha or beta status.

This is pre-release code and as such isn’t appropriate for production use, and is unlikely to function properly with provisioning solutions such as Citrix XenDesktop and Citrix CloudPlatform. It is expected that users of Citrix XenDesktop and Citrix CloudPlatform will be able to begin testing Creedence within the XenServer Tech Preview time-frame announced at Citrix Synergy. In preparation for the Tech Preview, all XenServer users, including those running XenDesktop, are encouraged to validate if Creedence is able to successfully install on their chosen hardware.

Key Questions

When does the alpha period start?

The alpha period starts on May 19th 2014

When does the alpha period end?

There is no pre-defined end to the alpha period. Instead, we’re providing access to nightly builds and from those nightly builds we’ll periodically promote builds to “alpha.x” status. The promotion will occur as key features are incorporated and stability targets are reached. As we progress the alpha period will naturally transition into a beta or Tech Preview stage ultimately ending with a XenServer release. Announcements will be made on when a new build is promoted.

Where do I get the build?

The build can be downloaded from at:

If I encounter a defect, how do I enter it?

Defects and incidents are expected with this alpha, and they can be entered at Users wishing to submit or report issues are advised to review our submission guidelines to ensure they are collecting enough information for us to resolve any issues.

Where can I find more information on Creedence?

We are pleased to announce a public wiki has been created at to contain key architectural information about XenServer; including details about Creedence.

How do I report compatibility information?

The defect system offers Hardware and Vendor compatibility projects to collect information about your environment. Please report both successes and failures for our review.

What about upgrades?

The alpha will not upgrade any previous version of XenServer, including nightly builds from trunk, and there should be no expectation the alpha can be upgraded.

Do I need a new XenCenter?

Yes, XenCenter has been updated to work with the alpha and can be installed from the installation ISO.

Will I need a new SDK?

If you are integrating with XenServer, the SDK has also been updated. Please obtain the SDK for the alpha from the download page.

Where can I ask questions?

Since the Creedence alpha is being posted to and managed by the team, questions asked on Citrix Support Forums are likely to go unanswered. Those forums are intended for released and supported versions of XenServer. Instead we are inviting questions on the xs-devel mailing list, and via twitter to @XenServerArmy. In order to post questions, you will need to subscribe to the mailing list which can be done here: Please note that the xs-devel mailing list is monitored by the engineering team, but really isn’t intended as a general support mechanism. If your question is more general purpose and would apply to any XenServer version, please validate if the issue being experienced is also present with XenServer 6.2 and if so ask the question on the Citrix support forums.  We've also created some guidelines for submitting incidents.

Recent Comments
Tim Mackey
James, This first release (alpha.1) is really about core functionality. With a new Xen Project hypervisor and 64bit dom0 there i... Read More
Monday, 19 May 2014 22:31
Tobias Kreidl
Tim, Awesome! The user community is collectively excited about this next evolutionary step for XenServer. It would be great to hav... Read More
Monday, 19 May 2014 18:04
Andrew Halley
Hi Tobias, there's a summary of the alpha(.1) content available on the wiki here: Read More
Tuesday, 20 May 2014 16:15
Continue reading
32843 Hits

XenServer Status – January 2014

The release of true hardware GPU sharing and XenServer 6.2 SP1 was a strong finish to 2013 and based on the feedback from the Citrix Partner Summit a few weeks back, we really are a key differentiator for Citrix XenDesktop which fulfills one of the roles XenServer has in the ecosystem. Of course this also opens the question of how to get the sources for the cool new bits, and I’ll cover that in just a little bit. Looking beyond the commercial role for XenServer, we also saw significant growth in the core project with visitors, page views, downloads and mailing list activity all up at least 20% compared to December. From the perspective of engineering accomplishments, completed work in Q4 included a move to 4.3 for the Xen Project hypervisor, a move to CentOS 6.4 with Linux kernel to 3.10, and significant work towards a 64 bit dom0, upstream support for Windows PV drivers and blktap3 for storage. All told, this is a fantastic base from which to build upon in 2014.

Speaking of foundations, as an open source project we have an obligation to our community to provide clear access to the source used to produce XenServer. Unfortunately, it’s become apparent some confusion exists in the state of the project and source code locations. Fundamentally we had a miscommunication where many assumed the sources on and posted in GitHub represented XenServer 6.2 and that code changes which occurred in the GitHub repositories represented the XenServer 6.2 product direction. In reality, XenServer 6.2 represents a fork of XenServer which occurred prior to the creation of and the code which is part of represents trunk. So what does this mean for those of you looking for code, and for that matter test your solution with the correct binaries? To solve that I’ve created this handy little table:

XenServer 6.1 and prior Source is located on within the downloads section
XenServer 6.2 Source is located on within the downloads section, and on download page
XenServer 6.2 hotfixes Source is located within the zip file containing the hotfix
XenServer 6.2 SP1 Source is located within the zip file containing the service pack
XenServer trunk Source is located in the XenServer GitHub repository
XenServer nightly builds Source is located in the XenServer GitHub repository
XenCenter 6.1 and prior Source is not available
XenCenter 6.2 and later Source is located in the XenServer GitHub repository, and all XenCenter 6.2 versions are built from trunk
XenServer optional components Not all optional components are open source. For components which are open source, the source will be available with the component. Note that source code from third parties may require a license from the third party to obtain source (e.g. proprietary headers)


So what does this mean for specific feature work, and more importantly the next major version of XenServer? If the work being performed occurs within the XenServer 6.2 branch (for example as a hotfix), then that work will continue to be performed as it always has and source will be posted with that release. The only exception to that is work on XenCenter which is always occurring in trunk. Work for the next major release will occur in trunk as it currently has, but specific feature implementations in trunk shouldn't be considered "ready" until we actually release. In practice that means we may have some proof of concept stuff get committed, and we may decide that proof of concept work isn't compatible with newer work and refactor things before the release. I hope this clears things up a little, and there is now a better understanding of where a given feature can be found.     

Recent Comments
Tim, you mention the move to Xen 4.3, the move to CentOS 6.4 with Linux kernel to 3.10, and the significant work towards a 64-bit ... Read More
Sunday, 16 February 2014 06:52
Kristoffer Sheather
Can you provide a roadmap / projected schedule for the next releases of XenServer?
Monday, 03 March 2014 00:49
Continue reading
17833 Hits

The XenServer Project Plan and Roadmaps

Citrix XenServer is undergoing a transition to an open and transparent development model.  This model will enable users, customers, partners, vendors, consultants and pretty much anyone with an interest in the future and direction of XenServer become active participants.  The transition from a closed development model to an open one doesn’t take place overnight, and it doesn’t come without its share of challenges.  As we work towards completing this transition and fulfilling the promise of a vibrant open source project, this page will contain the current status of our efforts, and the next major milestones. 

In traditional product management there is always discussion about “roadmaps”.  Since we’re transitioning from closed development practices there will undoubtedly be those who wish to see a roadmap for XenServer.  I hate to disappoint, but we don’t have one.  Instead we have a development and project plan.  The plan shows the current prioritization of feature development, and the current development status.  Work is actively underway to make that public, but it will take a bit more time.  Of course, that then leads people to conclude that an underlying roadmap with specific feature deliveries forms part of the plan.  While true in theory, in open source development things are just a little bit different.  With an open source project, it’s not the features that matter but rather support of those features.

Long time users of XenServer will be very familiar with the “Supported”, “Experimental” and “Unsupported” labels given to features, and that model will continue as we move forward.  In fact what distinguishes a release is the date of supportability and the support labels given to features.  For those unfamiliar with these labels, and to refresh for those who are, here is how we define them for those people who have software maintenance with Citrix:

  • Supported – Customers will receive support from Citrix for their implementation of the feature
  • Experimental – This label tends to be applied to implementations of a feature which function within a narrow scope.  We’ve used it multiple times over the years and in practice this means that Citrix will provide support on a “best effort basis”, but that at the end of the day the code is experimental and it might not be possible to do what the customer expected.
  • Unsupported – Customers are on their own if they have made modifications to the system which are outside the expected configuration parameters.  This was and remains an important item as we have a general purpose Linux distribution (dom0) as part of the shipping product and as such Linux experts can and do install packages or make changes which could render the system inoperable.  Often customers enter into this territory with the best of intentions and our escalation engineers do try to provide some level of support as part of goodwill.  I would expect that anyone building their own XenServer from source would be 100% unsupportable as we’d have no way to know what they’ve done.

In practice this means that until something has official support, the support burden will be borne by the community.  Once a release occurs, then certain features will potentially become supported.  So what community members can expect is that when we release we will clearly state which features are Supported or Experimental and anything which has no specification can be assumed Unsupported with the support burden remaining with the community itself.  Further with each release will also come a date when support or maintenance won’t be available.  As with all shipping and supported Citrix products, this is listed in the product lifecycle matrix.

So with that as the backdrop, here are the next items on our agenda:

Major project activity: Publish project plan through next release cycle

Next release cycle: Q1 2014

Recent comment in this post
Tobias Kreidl
Hi, Tim: Thanks for this article. The open-sourcing of Xenserver has indeed generated a lot of positive buzz. One thought concerns... Read More
Friday, 23 August 2013 03:08
Continue reading
12781 Hits
1 Comment

About XenServer

XenServer is the leading open source virtualization platform, powered by the Xen Project hypervisor and the XAPI toolstack. It is used in the world's largest clouds and enterprises.
Technical support for XenServer is available from Citrix.